User Acquisition
Case Study

434 users in 30 days on a $2,000 budget, at roughly $4.60 each

FillipA fuel savings app, used at the pump 400 usersThe goal, before the end of Q4 2019 $2,000 over 30 daysThe whole budget and the whole window

The objective

Finding the audience was not the problem. Finding where they stood was.

The challenge in user acquisition changes from one project to the next. Sometimes the audience is the barrier, sometimes the budget is. For Fillip neither was. What mattered was the specific place each audience was standing when the app would be useful to them, which is at a pump.

So the campaign aimed at geography as closely as it aimed at people, and the creative legitimised the app by showing the barrier it removes and how little work it takes to use.

A paper collage in slate blue and amber illustrating a user acquisition case study

The audiences

Three segments, three different reasons to download

Fillip ad for the blue collar segment: a worker in a hi-vis vest paying at the pump from his phone

Blue collar

Saving money was the value that moved them. The ad said so plainly, and it ran against the postal codes where they fill up.

Fillip ad for the white collar segment: a man in a winter coat filling up beside his car

White collar

Convenience, not savings. The call to action dropped every reference to money and spoke to the time the app gives back.

Fillip ad for the couples segment: two people at the pump looking at the app together

Couples

Convenience again, read as one less thing to think about. Each segment was split by gender as well, which set how the ad spoke.

The approach

Four moves, in this order

  1. Build the audiences. Three segments, each broken down by what they win, what they need and what they want, then split again by gender so the wording could change.
  2. Geo-locate the pumps. Gas stations were located by postal code and each ad was matched to its region, so blue collar creative ran in blue collar areas.
  3. Design to the segment. Branding and creative were simplified so the message carried the ad, rather than the ad carrying the brand.
  4. Change the call to action. Week by week it became clear that only one segment valued saving. For the other two the call to action moved to convenience.

The result

Thirty days, counted

434users acquired

Against a goal of 400, inside the 30 days.

$4.60per user

Across 434 users on a $2,000 budget.

2,708clicks

Traffic was the first objective, since the app had to do the convincing itself.

30days

On a $2,000 budget for the month, with nothing held in reserve.

Understanding the audience, their values and their barriers was what carried this campaign, which mattered more because the window was only thirty days.

The same segmentation is where a Marketing Foundation starts, and it is what every campaign after it is built on.

The curious questions

Frequently asked questions

To acquire 400 new app users before the end of Q4 2019, on a $2,000 monthly budget over 30 days, so driving qualified traffic was the primary objective.

By segmenting the audience into blue collar, white collar and couples, then geo-locating gas stations by postal code and matching each ad to the right region.

It acquired 434 users in 30 days at roughly $4.60 per user, on a $2,000 budget.

Understanding each audience's values and barriers: blue-collar users responded to saving money, while couples and white-collar users responded to convenience, so the call to action changed by segment.